We are internationally known
as the "go to" lawyers for assessing and effecting the tax
considerations and consequences of payments made or received in
litigation, including attorneys' fees. We advise the litigants
themselves, their lawyers, and even judges on the tax treatment of
civil and criminal litigation. Rob Wood is widely
considered to be the preeminent expert in the U.S. and
internationally on the taxation of damage awards and settlement
payments. A former Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
recently referred to him as the "preeminent authority for tax
practitioners on the federal taxation of damages and settlement
payments." (Gibbs, Tax Notes,
April 18, 2005, p. 393.) As the leading tax practitioner in this
highly complex and unique area of the tax law, he frequently
counsels clients (or represents clients against taxing authorities)
on the consequences of litigation payments and
recoveries.
Mr. Wood has practiced in this area for over two decades. He
previously authored BNA's Tax
Management Portfolio on this topic (1986). In 1989 Tax Institute published
Robert Wood's ground-breaking treatise, Taxation of Damage Awards and
Settlement Payments. Now in its Third
Edition, Taxation of Damage Awards and Settlement Payments
remains the most recognized book in this volatile area of the tax
law. Taxation of Damage Awards and Settlement Payments is
frequently used and cited by practitioners, the Internal Revenue
Service, the U.S. Tax Court, state and local taxing authorities
(such as the California Franchise Tax Board), Congress, and the
Circuit Courts of Appeal. Citations to Rob Wood's book appear in
U.S. Supreme Court filings.
Wood's tax expertise covers an unusually wide variety of
cases, from wrongful death to antitrust, from securities fraud to
personal injury, from employment discrimination to broker-dealer
litigation. Perhaps more important, we are not focused on the tax
position of exclusively plaintiffs or defendants, but routinely
consider both a payor's and a payee's perspective. While we
generally act as an advocate, we have occasionally served as a kind
of tax-issue-mediator for both plaintiff and
defendant.
Our work on the tax aspects of cases relates to toxic torts,
gender discrimination, sexual harassment, race discrimination, age
discrimination, wrongful termination, defamation, securities law
violations, fraud, environmental remediation liabilities and fines,
will contests, contract disputes, antitrust, palimony and other
matters. Our services include advising litigating attorneys and/or
principals in the action on tax aspects, drafting or revising
settlement documents to reflect a tax-efficient structure, rendering
tax opinions to the principals or counsel, and, if necessary,
litigating the tax characterization of settlement payments or
providing expert
testimony on this topic.
Wood & Porter has consulted on claims or payments in
many jurisdictions, including California, New York, New Jersey,
Nevada, Texas, Kansas, Florida, Delaware, Rhode Island, Ohio,
Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Indiana,
Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, the District of Columbia,
Alabama, Arkansas, West Virginia, Wyoming, Georgia, Maine, Guam,
England and Germany. The nature of the proceedings have ranged from
settlements in advance of trial, arbitration or mediation,
negotiation of settlements before the filing of a complaint, and
other pre- and post-litigation tax advice. We have also regularly
represented taxpayers before the Appeals Division of the IRS, U.S.
Tax Court, appellate courts and state tax agencies concerning
litigation payments and recoveries.
Recent
representations include:
Tax adviser on a record setting $60 million discrimination verdict (Issa v. Roadway Package Systems, Inc).
Tax adviser on a $2.5 million EEOC race discrimination case in Hawaii.
Represented the ACLU on tax issues arising out of a landmark $1.1 million school harassment case (Flores v. Morgan Hill).
Provided tax advice to plaintiffs in litigation arising out of 600 unnecessary heart surgeries, as depicted in the book by Stephen Klaidman, Coronary: A True Story of Medicine Gone Awry.
Provided tax advice to plaintiffs in litigation in the U.S. and Hong Kong arising out of investments in a prominent Hong Kong company.
Advised the plaintiffs on tax issues in a $39.75 million antitrust settlement with 3M (Bradburn Parent/Teacher Store, Inc. v. 3M).
Provided tax advice to two plaintiffs in a case generating a $61 million jury verdict.
Represented the plaintiff in a case involving serial rapist and cosmetics empire heir Andrew Luster, who was ultimately brought to justice by Dog the Bounty Hunter.
Served as tax counsel in an airline industry
whistleblower case involving a $12.5 million verdict (Otto v.
North American Airlines, Inc., Alameda County Superior
Court).
Rendered tax advice in a landmark tobacco case
involving $50 million of punitive damages that went to the U.S.
Supreme Court (Richard Boeken v. Phillip Morris,
Incorporated, Case No. BC 226593, Los Angeles County Superior
Court).
Advised on the tax aspects of recoveries for
deaths in a nationally publicized burning nightclub incident.
Tax adviser on a $20 million verdict against Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher arising out of an art appraisal dispute which was the subject of a Wall Street Journal page one article. (See
Davies, "Lassos
and Lawsuits: Who Really Painted a Cowboy Tableau?", Wall
St. Journal, March 16, 2006, p . A1.)
Represented
class counsel in the structuring of attorneys' fees arising out of
a $100 million attorneys' fee award.
Rendered tax
advice on the largest recovery ever against a public school
district for denying an appropriate education to an autistic
child, a case that received national attention and which garnered
a Clay Award to Plaintiff's Counsel by the State Bar of California
(Porter v. Board of Trustees of Manhattan Beach Unified School
Dist., No. CV000842GAF (Los Angeles Co. Superior Court)).
Represented a departing partner in a global private equity
fund (Carlyle Group) with respect to certain tax
issues.
Represented the plaintiffs in a record-setting $6.7
million recovery against a school district for failure to educate
a special education student.
Advised the plaintiff in a case under seal in New York
arising out of spoliation (intentional destruction of evidence) by
a major stock brokerage firm.
Rendered a tax opinion to the plaintiff in a case arising
under Massachusetts law for the destruction and desecration of a
human body.
Advised a public multi-national insurer on the tax aspects
of a structured settlement vehicle, rendering a formal legal
opinion on the federal income tax effects of the assignment of
structured settlement obligations.
Represented the founders of a public software company in a
tax structuring of the settlement of intellectual property
litigation, coupled with an acquisition by another party to the
litigation (Synopsis, Inc. acquisition of Nassda
Corporation).
Provided tax advice to plaintiffs counsel in one of the
largest medical malpractice awards rendered against Kaiser
Permanente (Azari v. Kaiser Permanente).
Rendered tax advice to plaintiffs counsel in a
multi-million dollar class action against a public health care
company over unnecessary heart transplants (Tenet Healthcare
Corp., et al.).
Advised a class representative and plaintiff's counsel on
the tax treatment of a multi-million dollar recovery arising out
of a failure of a structured settlement company, including filing
declarations with the court, conferences with IRS National Office,
etc.
Represented a large insurance company in the mediation of
tax issues arising out of a huge wrongful death
case.
Rendered a formal tax opinion regarding a multi-million
dollar intellectual property recovery by an inventor/entrepreneur,
and related legal malpractice actions.
On the
eve of trial, served as consultant on a unique Tax Court case
involving the exacerbation of physical injuries/physical
sickness.
Advised 175 women about tax alternatives concerning
settlements of over $500,000 each in a nationally-publicized class
action against the federal government, after 25 years of
litigation in the federal and U.S. Supreme Courts.
Represented the taxpayer in the settlement of an
environmental dispute arising out of post-September 11 clean-up
adjacent to the World Trade Center.
Represented multiple plaintiffs in tax controversies
arising out of nationally prominent gender discrimination against
a New York based global brokerage firm.
Represented the taxpayer in the appeal of a Tax Court
decision involving the taxation of a Pennsylvania Human Rights
recovery (Peaco v. Commissioner, 48 Fed.Appx. 423, 90
A.F.T.R. 2d 2002-6813, 2002 USTC P 50,707 (3rd Cir. Decided
9-27-02)).
Rendered tax advice in the whistleblower case on which the
movie The Insider was based.
Advised on the tax aspects of a case litigated in the U.S.
Supreme Court.
Rendered tax advice to plaintiff's lawyers and economists
on the charitable contributions and other tax aspects of
Microsoft's landmark antitrust settlement proposals.
Advised a financial institution on a $100 million recovery
arising out of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and
Enforcement Act.
Rendered tax advice on intellectual property litigation
involving U.S. and foreign distributees.
Advised Mexican and Brazilian companies receiving
settlement monies in a software distribution dispute from English
and Dutch defendants.
Represented the Relator in a federal whistleblower action,
U.S. ex. rel. Boisvert v. FMC Corporation, an action
involving more than $80 million, arising out of defective armored
vehicles operated in the Gulf War which generated national
publicity and coverage.
Rendered tax advice on settlement structure in the
litigation against PG&E depicted in the movie Erin
Brockovich.
Advised the whistleblower on tax consequences arising out
of a nationally publicized case concerning Medicare
fraud.
Represented prison guards in the tax treatment of a noted
harassment case.
Represented a multinational on the U.S. and U.K. tax
aspects of an employment settlement with her London
employer.
Represented the plaintiff on the state and federal tax
aspects of power plant litigation in the Nebraska Supreme
Court.
Represented a technology worker on the U.S. and U.K. tax
aspects of a disability dispute mediated in London.
Consulted with plaintiff's counsel and his client on tax
issues in a wrongful death case involving well over $100 million
in punitive damages.
Served
as tax counsel to the New Jersey Four in a federal civil rights
lawsuit as co-counsel to Johnnie Cochran, Peter Neufeld and Barry
Scheck. The case involved alleged racial profiling and four black
youths shot on the New Jersey Turnpike by State Troopers. The
recovery was in excess of $10 million.
Served
as tax counsel to a telecommunications concern in a multi-million
dollar antitrust action against one of the Bell telephone
companies, structuring the multi-million dollar verdict into a
tax-advantaged settlement for the plaintiff and its
shareholders.
Advised a college instructor in a multi-million dollar
series of actions against a state university for immigration
fraud, discrimination, etc.
Formed
a Qualified Settlement Fund (Section 468B) for the distribution of
proceeds to 3,000 Phen-Fen diet drug litigants in
Alabama.
Structured the recovery of a nationally publicized suit
against prison officials and a state correctional
system.
Advised a foreign national on the U.S. and foreign income
tax consequences of multi-million dollar biotechnology patent
recovery involving human growth hormones.
Rendered a formal legal opinion in the internationally
publicized Fen-Phen diet drug litigation.
Advised a film star settling a fraud and invasion of
privacy suit against another film star and movie
studio.
Structured a $150 million quasi-marital settlement
involving the founder of a major internet company.
Restructured a settlement involving videotape royalties
between a legendary recording star and a major Hollywood film
studio.
Advised a group of plaintiffs and their lawyers in the
settlement of a multi-party sexual harassment case.
Assisted a large national law firm in tax planning
associated with a large contingent fee award.
Represented a group of former shareholders of a dissolved
law firm in the tax treatment of a multi-million dollar antitrust
settlement.
Advised the plaintiff and her attorneys in an
internationally televised sexual harassment case.
Advised several closely-held companies and their
shareholders on the tax treatment of a $20 million recovery for
anti-competitive business practices.
Structured a settlement award to an electronics
manufacturer in a multi-million dollar antitrust
action.
Structured a multi-million dollar recovery to a family
trust arising out of a series of complicated real estate
transactions.
Advised a class of plaintiffs in a multi-million dollar
lender liability action.
Advised a public company on the tax treatment of a
settlement with the company's discharged Chief Executive
Officer.
Assisted a former Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the
tax treatment of a multi-million dollar legal malpractice
award.
Served
as court-appointed expert to opine on the tax treatment of a
catastrophic injury settlement fund, resolving a deadlock between
the parties.
Advised many plaintiffs and their counsel in age, gender
and racial discrimination, sexual orientation and wrongful
termination claims.
Advised a multi-billion dollar international agribusiness
concern on the tax aspects of its settlement of fraud and
securities litigation.
Advised a pharmaceutical company on the treatment of a
recovery for unfair trade practices.
Assisted many departing executives in structuring both
litigated and non-litigated severance packages and negotiating
releases.
Successfully defeated in Tax Court a proposed assessment
based on the allocation of a settlement between tort and contract
claims.
Advised a group of litigants, attorneys and other tax
advisors on the tax treatment of fraud and undue influence by a
securities brokerage house.
Structured the settlement of an environmental dispute with
a governmental agency for a public Silicon Valley high-tech
concern.
Rob Wood regularly
speaks nationally to accountant, attorney and business groups, and
he has published hundreds of articles on the
tax treatment of litigation payments for legal, accounting, tax and
employment publications.