TAX AND ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ISOs
It may be overly optimistic to give a comprehensive view of ISOs
in a publication of this size (much less in one brief article). Still,
there are a few fundamentals about ISOs that are worth noting, particularly
inasmuch as they stand in rather stark contrast to the NSO rules. NSOs,
as discussed in the preceding article, have almost a complete lack of restrictions.
ISOs must meet all of the following requirements:
Basic Tax Treatment of ISOs
There is no tax when the company grants the ISO. There is also no
tax (no regular income tax anyhow) when the ISO is exercised. This “no
tax on grant, no tax on exercise” mantra has gotten a fair number of ISO
participants in trouble. The not so hidden but sometimes surprisingly painful
reason is the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”). There can be AMT when ISOs
are exercised. The only regular tax possible with an ISO is when the underlying
shares acquired pursuant to the option are sold. And, when these shares
are sold, they can qualify for capital gain treatment (and assuming the
long-term holding period is met, long-term capital gain). There is even
a trick about this long-term capital gain (see “Sale of ISO Shares” below).
A word about the AMT. With a little luck, this could all change given
the politics of tax legislation this year. Indeed, a few M&A Tax Report
readers may remember that the entire individual AMT was expected to be
repealed last year, something that unfortunately did not happen. The AMT
can be a real mess to compute. Suffice it to say that the entire spread
between the ISO exercise price and the fair market value of the underlying
stock as of the date of exercise is considered a tax preference (translation:
it goes into the AMT computation). Unless the employee exercises the ISOs
and immediately sells the stock, the employee will get stuck with what
may be a significant AMT liability.
Sale of ISO Shares
As if the ISO rules weren’t complicated enough, it is important to
clarify the above statement about long-term gain on sale of shares. You
might think that long-term capital gain treatment would be assured if you
exercise an ISO, wait a year and a day, and then sell your shares. As with
just about everything else concerning ISOs, it’s not quite that simple.
There are two fundamental types of sales of shares acquired by an ISO.
The first is a “qualifying sale.” As its name suggests, this is obviously
the “good” kind of sale. The second is a “disqualifying sale,” which carries
an equally obvious moniker. The employee will recognize capital gain or
loss if the sale is made in a qualifying sale, meaning two requirements
must be met. The sale must be made at least two years after the date of
grant, and one year after the shares are transferred to the employee (i.e.,
one year after the ISOs are exercised).
The sale is a disqualifying one if it is made within two years from
the date of grant or within one year after the shares are transferred to
the employee. Many an employee has received a grant of ISOs, exercised
the options, held the stock for just over a year and then blithely sold
it assuming it would receive long-term capital gain treatment. No go, if
the sale of shares does not occur at least two years from the date the
ISOs were granted. In this disqualifying sale, the spread upon exercise
is treated as compensation income. The balance of the gain is long- or
short-term capital gain, depending upon the holding period of the shares
acquired.
Note especially the and/or conjunctions in the last few paragraphs.
It is truly surprising how many ISO holders exercise and then unwittingly
these disposition rules wrong (ouch!).
Treatment by Employer
It should come as no surprise that, for tax purposes, the employer
is not entitled to an income tax deduction when the ISO is granted, or
even when it is exercised. Indeed, the employer is not even entitled to
a deduction when the employee sells the shares acquired on the exercise
of an ISO in a qualifying disposition. A qualifying disposition is a good
thing for an employee (because it imports capital gain treatment). But
it is a bad thing for the employer (no tax deduction). From the employer’s
perspective, a disqualifying disposition (because it has compensation income,
at least to a certain extent), will result in the employer becoming entitled
to a tax deduction (for the amount of that compensation).
Accounting Treatment of ISOs
The accounting treatment of ISOs has been controversial. The basic
accounting treatment of ISOs is one reason companies do not like ISOs (especially
when they are trying to make their earnings for financial statement purposes
look good (and what company doesn’t?). The basic value of ISOs is a charge
to earnings at the time the ISOs are granted, even though no tax deduction
is available (and no compensation is actually treated as paid to the employee/ISO
recipient) until the ISOs are exercised.
Tax and Accounting Treatment of ISOs, Vol. 9, No. 10, M&A
Tax Report (May 2001), p. 1.
Obviously, this is a fairly onerous and extensive list of requirements,
particularly when one compares it to the almost nonexistent list of requirements
for NSOs. Among other reasons, this lengthy list of potential footfalls
is why ISOs can be a real pain in the neck. But, for those who are offered
ISOs, the difference in tax treatment can be significant.